Abstract
The aim of this study is to examine whether adolescents’ self-esteem, school anger and life satisfaction predict school attachment significantly. Study group of the research consists of 369 high school students. As the data collection tool in the research, School Attachment Scale Among Children and Adolescents (High School Form), Life Satisfaction Inventory, Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory and Multidimensional Anger Scale were employed. Data analysis was conducted using the Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient and the Hierarchical Regression Analysis. As a result of analyses carried out, a significant relationship was found between life satisfaction and sub-dimensions of school attachments (attachment to school, attachment to friend and attachment to teacher) and school anger sub-dimensions. In regression models constructed in the study, on the other hand, it was found out that anger experience and hostility sub-dimensions and life satisfaction significantly predict the school attachment sub-dimension. Besides, it was observed that anger experience, hostility and positive coping sub-dimensions predict friend attachment sub-dimension of life satisfaction; destructive expression, hostility and life satisfaction sub-dimensions predict teacher attachment, and they contributed to the model significantly. However, it was determined that self-esteem did not predict school attachment sub-dimensions significantly. It is considered that these obtained results can be used in studies to be conducted with a view to increase adolescents’ school attachment and they may establish basis for new studies.
Highlights
Yaşam DoyumuTablo 3’te görülen regresyon analizi sonuçları incelendiğinde; çalışmada kurgulanan I.
Modelin anlamlı olmadığı (F=2.15), diğer modellerin anlamlı olduğu görülmektedir (F=42.13; F=36.35).
Bütün değişkenler %35.2 varyans açıklama yüzdesiyle okula bağlanmayı açıklamaktadır.
Summary
Tablo 3’te görülen regresyon analizi sonuçları incelendiğinde; çalışmada kurgulanan I. Modelin anlamlı olmadığı (F=2.15), diğer modellerin anlamlı olduğu görülmektedir (F=42.13; F=36.35). Bütün değişkenler %35.2 varyans açıklama yüzdesiyle okula bağlanmayı açıklamaktadır. Birinci adımda girilen benlik saygısı değişkeninin .005 açıklama yüzdesi ile modele anlamlı katkı vermediği görülmektedir (β=.07, t=1.46). İkinci adımda girilen öfke yaşantısı, düşmanlık, yıkıcı ifade ve olumlu başa çıkma alt boyutlarıyla oluşturulan modelin %33.9 varyans açıklama yüzdesiyle anlamlı olduğu görülmektedir. Modele anlamlı katkı veren değişkenler incelediğinde sadece öfke yaşantısı (β=-.13, t=2.95) ve düşmanlık alt boyutunun (β=-.62, t=-14.08) anlamlı katkı verdiği görülmektedir. Üçüncü adımda girilen yaşam doyumu değişkeniyle oluşturulan modelin ise %08 varyans açıklama yüzdesiyle anlamlı olduğu ve modele anlamlı katkı verdiği belirlenmiştir (β=.09, t=2.28)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.