Abstract
The Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program of the USDA Forest Service alters plot locations before releasing data to the public to ensure landowner confidentiality and sample integrity, but using data with altered plot locations in conjunction with other spatially explicit data layers produces analytical results with unknown amounts of error. We calculated the potential error from using altered location data in combination with other data layers that varied in mean map unit size. The incidence of errors associated with the use of altered plot locations exhibited a strong inverse relationship to the mean map unit size of the other data sets used in the analyses. For a 30 m × 30 m resolution land cover map, plot misclassification rates ranged from 32% to 66%, whereas only 1%–10% of plots were misclassified for ecological subsection data (mean polygon size 9067 km2). Housing density data derived from the US Decennial Census (mean polygon size = 5.7 km2) represented an intermediate condition, with 5%–70% of data points misclassified when altered plot locations were used. These analyses demonstrate the impacts of altering FIA plot locations and represent an important step toward making the FIA database more helpful to a broad variety of end users.
Paper version not known (Free)
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have