Abstract
This paper undertakes a comparative study of adaptive signal enhancers (ASE) of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) for spinal cord compression detection. We compare the ASE methods based on two adaptive filtering algorithms: the least mean squares (LMS) and Kalman filter (KF) in terms of their convergence rate, variability, and complexity. In addition, the two ASE methods are compared with the conventional ensemble averaging (EA) method for SEP extraction. Experimental results on a rat model show that the LMS-based and KF-based ASE methods have similar superior performance over the EA method and the two ASE methods also exhibit some slightly different properties during SEP extraction.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
