Abstract

The rate at which genomes adapt to environmental changes and the prevalence of adaptive processes in molecular evolution are two controversial issues in current evolutionary genetics. Previous attempts to quantify the genome-wide rate of adaptation through amino-acid substitution have revealed a surprising diversity of patterns, with some species (e.g. Drosophila) experiencing a very high adaptive rate, while other (e.g. humans) are dominated by nearly-neutral processes. It has been suggested that this discrepancy reflects between-species differences in effective population size. Published studies, however, were mainly focused on model organisms, and relied on disparate data sets and methodologies, so that an overview of the prevalence of adaptive protein evolution in nature is currently lacking. Here we extend existing estimators of the amino-acid adaptive rate by explicitly modelling the effect of favourable mutations on non-synonymous polymorphism patterns, and we apply these methods to a newly-built, homogeneous data set of 44 non-model animal species pairs. Data analysis uncovers a major contribution of adaptive evolution to the amino-acid substitution process across all major metazoan phyla—with the notable exception of humans and primates. The proportion of adaptive amino-acid substitution is found to be positively correlated to species effective population size. This relationship, however, appears to be primarily driven by a decreased rate of nearly-neutral amino-acid substitution because of more efficient purifying selection in large populations. Our results reveal that adaptive processes dominate the evolution of proteins in most animal species, but do not corroborate the hypothesis that adaptive substitutions accumulate at a faster rate in large populations. Implications regarding the factors influencing the rate of adaptive evolution and positive selection detection in humans vs. other organisms are discussed.

Highlights

  • Characterizing and quantifying adaptation at the molecular level is one of the major goals of evolutionary genomics

  • The theory predicts that adaptation is easier in large than in small populations, and the genomic studies of model organisms have revealed a much higher adaptive rate in large populationsized flies than in small population-sized humans and apes

  • We build and analyse a large data set of protein-coding sequences made of thousands of genes in 44 pairs of PLOS Genetics | DOI:10.1371/journal.pgen

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Characterizing and quantifying adaptation at the molecular level is one of the major goals of evolutionary genomics. Analysing the Adh gene in Drosophila, these authors compared the ratio of the number of non-synonymous (potentially selected) to synonymous (supposedly neutral) substitutions between species, dN/dS, to the ratio of the number of non-synonymous to synonymous polymorphisms within species, pN/pS. They showed that the former ratio was higher than the latter, which was interpreted as resulting from adaptive evolution. In absence of adaptive evolution, dN/dS is expected to be equal to pN/pS (neutral model), or lower than pN/pS (nearly-neutral model [9])

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call