Abstract

This paper reports on results from two major research projects conducted in South Australia. The first investigates adaptation to climate change in two of the state’s major grain and sheep farming regions, using semi-structured interviews and focus groups. The second uses a postal questionnaire and an internet-based survey of residents in the peri-urban fringes of Adelaide, the state capital, to examine knowledge of and attitudes to climate change and resulting adaptations, especially in the context of increasing risk of wildfires. The research on adaptation to climate change in agriculture focused on formal institutions (e.g., government agencies) and communities of practice (e.g., farm systems groups). Both groups noted that farmers autonomously adapt to various risks, including those induced by climate variability. The types and levels of adaptation varied among individuals partly because of barriers to adaptation, which included limited communication and engagement processes established between formal institutions and communities of practice. The paper discusses possibilities for more effective transfers of knowledge and information on climate change among formal institutions, communities of practice, trusted individual advisors and farmers. Research in the peri-urban fringe revealed that actions taken by individuals to mitigate and/or adapt to climate change were linked to the nature of environmental values held (or ecological worldview) and place attachment. Individuals with a strong place attachment to the study area (the Adelaide Hills) who possessed knowledge of and/or beliefs in climate change were most likely to take mitigating actions. This was also linked to previous experience of major risk from wildfires. The paper concludes by discussing prospects for developing co-management for reducing the impact of climate change across multiple groups in rural and peri-urban areas.

Highlights

  • This paper reports on results from two major research projects conducted in South Australia: one on ‘Regional communities adapting to climate change’ and the other on ‘Bushfires and biodiversity: Optimising conservation outcomes in peri-urban areas at risk.’ The latter used a postal questionnaireEnvironments 2018, 5, 40; doi:10.3390/environments5030040 www.mdpi.com/journal/environmentsEnvironments 2018, 5, 40 and an internet-based survey of residents in the peri-urban fringes of Adelaide, the state capital, to examine knowledge of and attitudes to climate change and resulting mitigation/adaptation, especially in the context of increasing risk of wildfires

  • Australia [52] showed that two-thirds of respondents to the postal questionnaire agreed with the climate change was altering wildfire risk on their properties

  • They respond in different ways: from some householders making little attempt to adapt to greater heat and/or drought to some farmers making substantial modifications to their farming systems in attempts to withstand drier and hotter conditions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper reports on results from two major research projects conducted in South Australia: one on ‘Regional communities adapting to climate change’ and the other on ‘Bushfires and biodiversity: Optimising conservation outcomes in peri-urban areas at risk.’ The latter used a postal questionnaireEnvironments 2018, 5, 40; doi:10.3390/environments5030040 www.mdpi.com/journal/environmentsEnvironments 2018, 5, 40 and an internet-based survey of residents in the peri-urban fringes of Adelaide, the state capital, to examine knowledge of and attitudes to climate change and resulting mitigation/adaptation, especially in the context of increasing risk of wildfires (termed locally as bushfires). This paper reports on results from two major research projects conducted in South Australia: one on ‘Regional communities adapting to climate change’ and the other on ‘Bushfires and biodiversity: Optimising conservation outcomes in peri-urban areas at risk.’. One relates to decisions taken by farmers with respect to their farm operations whilst the second reports on attitudes and actions of householders in the peri-urban fringe In both cases emphasis is placed on responses to available information and what might constitute improved communication strategies to overcome barriers to adaptation

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call