Abstract

Electric appliances used in workplaces and everyday life often generate a low-frequency noise, which affects human body systems. Passive methods employed to reduce noise are not effective at low frequencies. The classical approach to active noise control practically involves the generation of local zones of quiet, whereas at other areas the noise is reinforced. Moreover, it usually requires a large number of secondary sound sources. Hence, an active casing approach has been developed. The active casing panels’ vibrations are controlled to reduce the device noise emission. Efficiency of this method has been previously confirmed by the authors and the results have been reported in multiple journal publications. However, in the previous research experiments, the active casing was placed at a distance from the enclosure walls. In this research, the active casing is located in a corner and such placement is intentionally used to facilitate the active control system’s operation. The noise reduction performance is investigated at multiple configurations, including a range of distances from the corner and different error microphone arrangements. The analysis of both primary and secondary paths is given. Advantages and drawbacks of different active casing configurations are presented and discussed.

Highlights

  • Nowadays, due to technological progress, noise level enhancement has been observed

  • The active noise control methods are most efficient at low frequencies up to about 500 Hz, this is the frequency range of interest in this research

  • The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the overall control performance of the active casing placed in a corner

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Due to technological progress, noise level enhancement has been observed. Machines and devices commonly used in industry and everyday life generate noise, which may cause health damage. The most important feature is that the active casing provides a global noise reduction in a whole room (reduces the noise emission), instead of creating only local zones of quiet and enhancing the noise elsewhere. The presented research aims to evaluate the hypothesis that placing the active casing in a corner and appropriately rearranging the microphones can lead to both enhanced noise reduction levels and a wider frequency range of global noise reduction (in the entire room). The noise reduction performance is investigated and compared for multiple configurations, including a range of distances from the corner and different error microphone arrangement. The analysis of both primary and secondary paths is given.

The Laboratory Setup
The Experiment Assumptions
Reflectivity of a Wall Surface
Distance between the Casing and the Corner
Placement of Error Microphones
Primary and Secondary Paths
Primary Paths Analysis
Secondary Paths Analysis
The amplitude functions ofthe theimpulse impulseresponse response estimates
Active
Active Control System Performance
Both of these two
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.