Abstract

Intracellular recordings were made from neurons in rabbit and feline vesical parasympathetic ganglia in vitro. In response to cathodal current injection (0.1–1 nA for 2–20 ms) the majority of rabbit neurons (229 out of 250) exhibited a single action potential that was followed by a fast and slow after-hyperpolarization (sAHP neuron). The remainder of the cells exhibited an action potential followed by only a fast after-hyperpolarization (fAHP neuron). fAHP neurons did not exhibit anomalous rectification and a spontaneous rhythmic hyperpolarization, which were common membrane properties in sAHP neurons. In response to a train of cathodal current pulses (5–20 Hz for 0.1–10 s), fAHP neurons exhibited action potentials followed by a post-tetanic depolarization (PTD). The PTD was associated with a decrease in membrane input resistance. The amplitude and duration of the PTD were a function of the number of action potentials in the train. The amplitude of the PTD was increased by membrane hyperpolarization and its estimated reversal potential was approximately −30 mV. Low-chloride solution and intracellular injection of chloride ions augmented the amplitude and duration of the PTD, whereas low-sodium, high-potassium and low-potassium solutions did not affect them. Tetraethylammonium (5–10 mM) and barium (0.5–1 mM) increased the amplitude and duration of the PTD. Nominal calcium-free solutions and ω-conotoxin (500 nM) abolished the PTD. The data suggest that activation of chloride channels by calcium influx through ω-conotoxin-sensitive calcium channels mediates the PTD. Repetitive stimulation of the pelvic nerve evoked a train of orthodromic action potentials followed by the PTD of fAHP neurons. (+)-Tubocurarine (10 μM) and hexamethonium (200 μM), but not atropine (1 μM), abolished orthodromic action potentials and the PTD, whereas these cholinergic antagonists did not depress the PTD evoked by direct action potentials. In summary, the data suggest that the PTD may function as a slow synaptic potential in fAHP neurons. This appears likely because neither slow excitatory nor inhibitory postsynaptic potentials are present in neurons of rabbit vesical parasympathetic ganglia. In contrast, slow inhibitory and excitatory postsynaptic potentials were recorded from neurons in feline vesical parasympathetic ganglia.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call