Abstract
ABSTRACT This article looks at three important early works about television by David Foster Wallace that are not often studied in tandem: the stories ‘Little Expressionless Animals’ (1988) and ‘My Appearance’ (1988), and the long essay on television and American fiction, ‘E Unibus Pluram: Television and Contemporary U.S. Fiction’ (1993). The analysis attempts to show how Wallace's ‘metaffective fiction’ (Clare 2018) explores important assumptions about the role of emotions and affect in the production of literary works. Relying chiefly on affect theory, I study these early works’ depiction of television (i.e. the shows ‘Jeopardy’ and ‘Late Night with David Letterman’ respectively) as a world of hyper-self-consciousness that nevertheless possess the potential for authentic emotional response and adjustment. The article also tries to assess how Wallace's writing emphasises the relationship between affective writing's potential and the ways in which popular culture enables or disables our capacity for emotional responsiveness. Moreover, it also claims that in these works Wallace goes beyond the postmodern notion of a ‘waning of affect’ (Jameson 1990) under late capitalism to imagine a post-postmodernist fiction driven instead by an ‘intensification of affect’; that is, in the distorting imaginative space of television Wallace discovers how metaffective fiction (Clare 2019) can enable a suspension of disbelief that disrupts hyper-ironic postmodern self-consciousness and enables more authentic modes of expression and acting to emerge.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.