Abstract
Acoustic intensity measurements using the two‐sensor cross‐spectral density technique are susceptible to errors when made in the presence of mean flow. These errors are predominantly due to turbulent pressure fluctuations acting on and near the sensors. To quantify these errors, intensity measurements were performed in a sound field that contained both an independent acoustic source and a mean, low Mach number (M<0.1), turbulent boundary‐layer flow. The microphones were flushed mounted in the wall supporting the turbulent boundary layer and the acoustic source was positioned a large distance downstream. The streamwise component of intensity was measured with and without the flow keeping the sound output of the source constant. Associated bias errors were calculated in accordance with a theoretically established bias error [G. C. Lauchle, Noise Control Eng. J. 23, 52–59 (1984)]. As predicted theoretically, the calculated bias error decreases rapidly as the sensor separation distance increases relative to the correlation length associated with the turbulent boundary‐layer pressure fluctuations. [Work supported by various U.S. Navy projects at NSWC and ARL Penn State.]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.