Abstract
This study investigated acoustic features and prosodic strategies used by both healthy speakers and speakers with dysarthria, to produce a perceptually-detectable sentence accent. Accordingly, 80 adult speakers (50 with a speech impairment) were asked to produce 3 pairs of sentences with different accent positions. All speech samples were perceptually judged by three experts, and were acoustically analyzed. The fundamental frequency, intensity, and duration were not only analyzed within the syllable, but also in contrast with the previous syllable, and in contrast with the entire sentence. These features were used as input for a linear discriminant analysis. This newly-developed acoustic approach reveals that healthy speakers mainly rely on the following features to produce a perceptually-detectable accent: a change in frequency within the target syllable, with a simultaneous increase of intensity and contrast in the frequency between the target syllable and the previous syllable. Speakers with dysarthria mainly use the contrast in frequency and intensity between the target syllable and the previous syllable, rather than the contrasting with the rest of the sentence. They also use durational parameters as an element in prosodic accent production. Although both groups use some common features, they differ significantly (p < 0.01) in the way they realize accent production. The results of this study show that sentence accent production in dysarthric speech can be adequately described by a set of acoustic features. Until now, such description in the literature was primarily based on perceptual evaluations. The current approach may assist in objective assessments and more appropriate therapy methods.
Highlights
In contrast to written communication, oral communication carries supplementary information by means of acoustic changes in speech production
Healthy speakers seem to better control F0 and intensity changes (F0&Int, F0) within the target syllable; these efforts are supported by an increase of F0 in relation to the previous syllable
Within the relevant acoustic features employed by this group, we found that along with the features used by the healthy population, speakers with dysarthria use Int, dInt, dDrange, and Dm
Summary
In contrast to written communication, oral communication carries supplementary information by means of acoustic changes in speech production. This constitutes the so-called suprasegmental level of speech, described generally as prosody. A description of prosody and its role in human communication is provided by Boutsen [1], who defines prosody as “a tool of human expression that is conveyed acoustically by way of durational, intensity, and frequency cues.”. Dysprosody has a negative impact on speech intelligibility and the comprehensibility of oral communication, and is evident in each type of dysarthria identified by Darley et al [10] and De Bodt et al [11]. The principal population in this study are Dutch speakers affected with dysarthria
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have