Abstract
A global movement toward disaster resilience seeks to reconceptualize societal response to shock. Yet, despite disaster resilience’s interdisciplinary and collaborative components, some contemporary scholarship argues the praxis may subjugate and harm stakeholders. Seeking clarity regarding the decolonial and critical perspectives contesting Eurocentric disaster resilience, our article employs a thematic analysis to examine how disaster resilience may enshrine systemic problems of inequity and subjugation. Our findings offer new ideas to challenge dominant understanding of disaster resilience, creating a typology of overlapping characteristics and outcomes.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
