Abstract
Problem: It is important to know the levels of physical activity and sedentary time of people to be able to perform interventions in order to improve lifestyles. Therefore, it is interesting to compare how the physical activity, mass-used and low-cost questionnaires perform, with the accelerometers that provide objective measurements.Objective: to compare physical activity and sedentary time in a group of adults measured by accelerometry and estimated through what was reported in a self-reported physical activity questionnaire. Methods: 12 men and 17 women, mean age of 34.14 years (9.46DS). Accelerometry: each subject carried, at the level of the right hip and secured with a belt, a CSA 7164 uniaxial accelerometer for a week and completed the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ), proposed by the World Health Organization. Results: the t-test of related samples was used showing that there are significant differences between the average sedentary time measured with the accelerometer and with the questionnaire, (p = 0.00). The Wilcoxon test compared the physical activity measured with the accelerometer and with the questionnaire that showed significant differences (p = 0.009). A weak positive correlation (r = 0.45) in time (p = 0.014) could be observed, meaning that both devices register it with the same trend. Conclusion: Care must be taken when interpreting the results of physical activity questionnaires since in general they may present significantly different values than those reported by objective methods. It is necessary to improve the questionnaires, or their interpretation.
Highlights
La insuficiente actividad física y el elevado sedentarismo influyen en el deterioro de la calidad de vida, incluso colaborando con el desarrollo de enfermedades donde se compromete el balance metabólico, como la obesidad y la diabetes, aspectos en que la Salud Pública ha estado interesada desde hace años (U.S DepartmentHealth and Human Services, 1996; Lee, et al, 2012;World Health Organization, 2010)
Estos errores se incrementan cuando son evaluados niños y adolescentes (Ayala-Guzmán, Ramos-Ibáñez, & Ortiz-Hernández, 2017), principalmente aquellos menos inactivos (LeBlanc, & Janssen, 2010) y tanto es así, que algunos autores sostienen que los cuestionarios no deberían poder ser utilizados en este grupo etario como una estimación confiable de la actividad física moderada y vigorosa (AFMV) a nivel individual (Rääsk, et al, 2017)
Accelerometry does not match with self-reported physical activity and sedentary behaviors in Mexican children
Summary
Ministerio de Salud, Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina ORCID: 0000-0001-5899-2477. Resulta interesante comparar como se desempeñan los cuestionarios de actividad física, de usados masivamente y de bajo costo, con los acelerómetros que proveen mediciones objetivas. Resultados: se utilizó la prueba t de muestras relacionadas mostrando que existen diferencias significativas entre los promedios de tiempo sedentario medidos con el acelerómetro y con el cuestionario, (p=0.00). La prueba de Wilcoxon comparó la actividad física medida con el acelerómetro y con el cuestionario que arrojó diferencias significativas (p=0.009). Conclusión: se debe ser cuidadoso al interpretar los resultados de cuestionarios de actividad física ya que en general pueden presentar valores significativamente diferentes a los reportados por métodos objetivos. REVISTA UNIVERSITARIA DE LA EDUCACIÓN FÍSICA Y EL DEPORTE AÑO 13, No 13, DICIEMBRE DE 2020. ACCELEROMETERS AND QUESTIONNAIRES IN THE STUDY OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AND SEDENTARY BEHAVIOUR
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Revista Universitaria de la Educación Física y el Deporte
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.