Abstract
To accurately determine the dynamic response of a structure is of relevant interest in many engineering applications. Particularly, it is of paramount importance to determine the Frequency Response Function (FRF) for structures subjected to dynamic loads in order to avoid resonance and fatigue problems that can drastically reduce their useful life. One challenging case is the experimental determination of the FRF of submerged and confined structures, such as hydraulic turbines, which are greatly affected by dynamic problems as reported in many cases in the past. The utilization of classical and calibrated exciters such as instrumented hammers or shakers to determine the FRF in such structures can be very complex due to the confinement of the structure and because their use can disturb the boundary conditions affecting the experimental results. For such cases, Piezoelectric Patches (PZTs), which are very light, thin and small, could be a very good option. Nevertheless, the main drawback of these exciters is that the calibration as dynamic force transducers (relationship voltage/force) has not been successfully obtained in the past. Therefore, in this paper, a method to accurately determine the FRF of submerged and confined structures by using PZTs is developed and validated. The method consists of experimentally determining some characteristic parameters that define the FRF, with an uncalibrated PZT exciting the structure. These parameters, which have been experimentally determined, are then introduced in a validated numerical model of the tested structure. In this way, the FRF of the structure can be estimated with good accuracy. With respect to previous studies, where only the natural frequencies and mode shapes were considered, this paper discuss and experimentally proves the best excitation characteristic to obtain also the damping ratios and proposes a procedure to fully determine the FRF. The method proposed here has been validated for the structure vibrating in air comparing the FRF experimentally obtained with a calibrated exciter (impact Hammer) and the FRF obtained with the described method. Finally, the same methodology has been applied for the structure submerged and close to a rigid wall, where it is extremely important to not modify the boundary conditions for an accurate determination of the FRF. As experimentally shown in this paper, in such cases, the use of PZTs combined with the proposed methodology gives much more accurate estimations of the FRF than other calibrated exciters typically used for the same purpose. Therefore, the validated methodology proposed in this paper can be used to obtain the FRF of a generic submerged and confined structure, without a previous calibration of the PZT.
Highlights
In many engineering applications, it is of paramount importance to accurately determine the dynamic structural response of a structure in order to avoid dynamic problems such as resonances or fatigue that can drastically reduce their useful life
[17]isand paperinterest shows in that engineering the use of them gives generally resonance or fatigue problems that can reduce the useful life of such structures
One particular more realistic estimations of the damping ratios and more accurately predictions ofcase the is submerged and structures, such as used hydraulic turbines, which are subjected to high amplitude of the FRFconfined than other classical exciters in Experimental Modal Analysis (EMA)
Summary
It is of paramount importance to accurately determine the dynamic structural response of a structure (or assembly) in order to avoid dynamic problems such as resonances or fatigue that can drastically reduce their useful life. One of the main outputs of the modal analysis is the Frequency Response Function (FRF), which is the relationship between the response of the structure (in terms of vibration) and the dynamic force This is important when analyzing the dynamic response of the structure due to an exciting force with a frequency content close to one of the natural frequencies of the structure, since the response of the structure can be determined with precision and resonance or fatigue problems, which have caused several failures in the past [5,6], could be avoided. Typical actuators that are used for modal analysis are instrumented hammers, which are not fixed to the structure and many different types of shakers (fixed or not to the structure) For these exciters, the sensitivity is generally known (given by the manufacturer) and the force that is being applied to the structure can be directly obtained from the electrical signal. Piezoelectric Patches (PZTs), which are extremely light and thin, could be used to determine the FRF
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.