Abstract
In the present study, we tried to review the current literature, focusing on the effect of different guide systems on the accuracy of the digital surgical guides.A search in PubMed’s database, without any date restriction, was performed using keywords based on the PICO question. 54 of the 2378 articles’ were chosen for full-text assessment. Articles were screened using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. 21 articles were included in the qualitative assessment. Descriptive analysis was performed for numeric parameters using mean ± standard deviation. Six types of guide systems were used in the included articles. The commonest guide system was SimPlant (45.64%) followed by NobleGuide (23.00%). The pooled mean angle deviation, global coronal deviation, and global apical deviation were 3.43 mm (95% CI = 2.96, 3.90), 1.16 mm (95% CI = 0.98, 1.24) and 1.35 mm (95% CI = 1.11, 1.59), respectively. The maximum mean(SD) of angle deviation, global coronal deviation, and global apical deviation happened in Stent Cad 4.1(1.86) degrees, NobleGuide 1.86(0.56) mm, and OnDemend3d 1.56(1.48) mm, respectively.Although a final statement could not be made on which system is better, it is certain that the software affects the deviation and could be as important as the implant itself. Clinical significanceThe choice of guide systems used for the production of static guide systems which was studied in this article could affect the accuracy of the implant placement procedure.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call