Accuracy of different definitive impression techniques with the all-on-4 protocol

Abstract

Statement of problemA nonpassive fit of implant-supported restorations can jeopardize the biological and mechanical success of the treatment. Data regarding the fit of different impression techniques for the all-on-4 protocol are limited. PurposeThe purpose of this in vitro study was to digitally evaluate 4 different impression techniques used with the all-on-4 protocol, with distal multiunit analogs positioned in 4 different angulations. Material and methodsFour maxillary definitive cast models with 4 multiunit analogs (T0 32202; NucleOSS) were fabricated according to the all-on-4 treatment protocol. In the anterior region, the analogs were positioned in a parallel direction, whereas in the posterior region, they were positioned in different angulations (0, 10, 20, and 30 degrees). One hundred and sixty models were obtained by using 4 different impression techniques (closed tray without plastic cap, closed tray with plastic cap, splinted open tray, sectioned resplinted open tray) (n=10) and polyvinyl siloxane impression material. Definitive casts and definitive duplicate casts were scanned using a modified laser scanner (Activity 880; Smart Optics Sensortechnik GmbH), and data were transferred to a software program (VRMesh Studio; Virtual Grid Inc). The definitive casts and definitive duplicate cast scans were digitally aligned. Angular and linear deviations in all axes (x, y, and z) of the analogs between definitive and duplicate casts were calculated and subjected to statistical analyses (α=.05). ResultsMean angular deviations were in the range of 0.03 to 0.16 degrees, and linear deviations were in the range of 0.10 to 0.75 mm. The increased angulation between impression copings caused higher linear and angular deviations when closed-tray impression techniques were used (P<.05). ConclusionsReduced linear and angular displacements were obtained from the open-tray impression techniques compared with the closed-tray impression techniques in the angulated groups. Angular and linear deviations increased with the increase in the angulation of the posterior analog.