Accuracy in static guided implant surgery: Results from a multicenter retrospective clinical study on 21 patients treated in three private practices

Abstract

PurposeTo evaluate the accuracy of a static computer-assisted implant surgery (s-CAIS) system across different private practices. MethodsThis retrospective clinical study was based on data retrieved from 21 patients who received 61 implants between 2018 and 2020 in 3 private practices run by surgeons with extensive experience with s-CAIS. All patients were treated using the same s-CAIS system, planning software, template manufacturing process, and surgical guides. The standard tessellation language (STL) file of the intraoral scan of the fixture taken immediately after implant placement was matched with that of the preoperative plan for comparisons of preoperative and planned implant positions with postoperative and actual implant positions. The study outcomes were linear and angular deviations between the planned and actual implant positions. ResultsNo surgical or postsurgical complications occurred. The overlap of the two STL files resulted in a mean angular deviation of 2.94° The mean linear deviation at the implant shoulder was 0.73 mm, and that at the apex was 1.06 mm. The mean vertical deviations at the implant shoulder and the apex were 0.29 mm and 0.01 mm, respectively. ConclusionAll cases showed satisfactory accuracy within the limits of this study (small number of patients and retrospective design). These results might be related to the use of a standardized digital workflow by experienced operators. Statement of clinical relevanceThe study shows that careful control of each step, from data acquisition to final execution, is key for the accuracy of stent-guided systems.