Abstract

Abstract. The technological developments in remote sensing (RS) during the past decade has contributed to a significant increase in the size of data user community. For this reason data quality issues in remote sensing face a significant increase in importance, particularly in the era of Big Earth data. Dozens of available sensors, hundreds of sophisticated data processing techniques, countless software tools assist the processing of RS data and contributes to a major increase in applications and users. In the past decades, scientific and technological community of spatial data environment were focusing on the evaluation of data quality elements computed for point, line, area geometry of vector and raster data. Stakeholders of data production commonly use standardised parameters to characterise the quality of their datasets. Yet their efforts to estimate the quality did not reach the general end-user community running heterogeneous applications who assume that their spatial data is error-free and best fitted to the specification standards. The non-specialist, general user group has very limited knowledge how spatial data meets their needs. These parameters forming the external quality dimensions implies that the same data system can be of different quality to different users. The large collection of the observed information is uncertain in a level that can decry the reliability of the applications. Based on prior paper of the authors (in cooperation within the Remote Sensing Data Quality working group of ISPRS), which established a taxonomy on the dimensions of data quality in GIS and remote sensing domains, this paper is aiming at focusing on measures of uncertainty in remote sensing data lifecycle, focusing on land cover mapping issues. In the paper we try to introduce how quality of the various combination of data and procedures can be summarized and how services fit the users’ needs. The present paper gives the theoretic overview of the issue, besides selected, practice-oriented approaches are evaluated too, finally widely-used dimension metrics like Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) or confusion matrix are discussed. The authors present data quality features of well-defined and poorly defined object. The central part of the study is the land cover mapping, describing its accuracy management model, presented relevance and uncertainty measures of its influencing quality dimensions. In the paper theory is supported by a case study, where the remote sensing technology is used for supporting the area-based agricultural subsidies of the European Union, in Hungarian administration.

Highlights

  • Dozens of algorithms operate to obtain different outcomes for countless applications of remote sensing data

  • The Dempster-Shafer belief theory is used as the basis for this approach in which the Fitness of Use (FoU) is represented as a range of possibilities and integrated into one value based on the information from multiple sources

  • In this paper we addressed the problem of the remote sensing data quality (RSDQ) especially from the accuracy dimension point of view to cover the lifecycle phases of production

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Dozens of algorithms operate to obtain different outcomes for countless applications of remote sensing data. Quality of procedures like image classification are usually described by statistics of a confusion matrix, the error budget may be a cumulative sum of errors originating from previous procedures Another interesting question arises from the fact that we usually assume that external sources like reference data, training sample for different procedures contain no error. Still no common, standardised measure for uncertainty estimations exists for image processing performed by the general user community as welldefined as by data providers. For this reason, the current paper goes into the detail of the interconnections between the remote sensing data quality

REMOTE SENSING DATA QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Terminology
RSDQ methodology – Uncertainty and Data Quality Metrics
ACCURACY DIMENSIONS IN REMOTE SENSING
Resolution Dimensions
Accuracy Dimensions
Dimension metrics: basic terms and their definitions
Mi X GTi 2
CASE STUDY
State acceptance of aerial photographs and orthophotographs
The validation of remote sensing images used as area measurement tools
Accuracy management model in land cover application
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call