Abstract

Abstract. The availability and accessibility of remote sensing (RS) data, cloud processing platforms and provided information products and services has increased the size and diversity of the RS user community. This development also generates a need for validation approaches to assess data quality. Validation approaches employ quality criteria in their assessment. Data Quality (DQ) dimensions as the basis for quality criteria have been deeply investigated in the database area and in the remote sensing domain. Several standards exist within the RS domain but a general classification – established for databases – has been adapted only recently. For an easier identification of research opportunities, a better understanding is required how quality criteria are employed in the RS lifecycle. Therefore, this research investigates how quality criteria support decisions that guide the RS lifecycle and how they relate to the measured DQ dimensions. Subsequently follows an overview of the relevant standards in the RS domain that is matched to the RS lifecycle. Conclusively, the required research needs are identified that would enable a complete understanding of the interrelationships between the RS lifecycle, the data sources and the DQ dimensions, an understanding that would be very valuable for designing validation approaches in RS.

Highlights

  • The last few years have seen a growth in availability and accessibility of remote sensing (RS) data

  • We have described the general relationships between the RS quality dimensions (QDs), the phases of the RS lifecycle and the used types of data sources

  • A detailed description of the RS information production process followed that gave an overview how Quality Criteria (QC) are used in highlighted phases

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The last few years have seen a growth in availability and accessibility of remote sensing (RS) data. With the thorough investigation of remote sensing data quality, ISPRS ICWG III/IVb follows the same strategic objectives as previous/parallel initiatives from IEEE, CEOS and GEO, e.g. with the Quality Assurance Framework for Earth Observation (QA4EO; http://qa4eo.org/). These are to enhance trust in EOderived information and to prevent wrong decisions based on EO-derived information by ensuring proper usage of EO data through the entire information production process. The used QIs ought to be based on the International Standards Organization (ISO) guide to the expression of uncertainty in information It is for the final user (customer) of the information to determine if the information, with its associated QI, is suitable for their requirement. We conclude with an investigation of the present gaps and the need for further research

THE DATA QUALITY DIMENSIONS TAXONOMY WITHIN THE REMOTE SENSING LIFECYCLE
STANDARDS FOR DATA QUALITY DIMENSIONS IN REMOTE SENSING
The Data Quality Standardization Bodies and Relevant Standards
The Standards in the Different Phases of the RS Lifecycle Process
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call