Abstract
PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the fit and mechanical stability of conventional versus passive fitting 3-unit fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) screw-retained on implants. MethodsTwenty acrylic models, each with two embedded implants, were fabricated and functioned as patient-models. Impressions were taken and 20 all-ceramic FDPs were pre-fabricated on the plaster casts. Respectively 10 FDPs were fixed on the plaster casts (group 1) and on the patient-models for passive fitting (group 2). The fit of each FDP was checked on the patient-model by means of visual control (grades 1–10) and microscopic examination. Furthermore, specimens were artificially aged for possible prosthodontic failures, followed by a fracture strength test. ResultsGroup 2 [1.4 (±0.3)] showed significantly (p<0.001) better results in the visual examination of the marginal fit compared to group 1 [6.3 (±2.4)]. The microscopic marginal misfit was 160μm (±80μm) at the abutment margin and 150μm (±80μm) at the axial wall of the abutment for group 1, respectively, 0μm and 0μm up to 17μm for group 2 (p<0.001). No failure of the FDPs could be observed during artificial aging in both groups. The fracture load showed no significant difference (p=0.60) between group 1 [2583N (±664N)] and group 2 [2465N (±238N)]. ConclusionsVisual and microscopic examination detected huge differences in marginal fit between groups 1 and 2. However, no statistically verifiable differences could be detected in long-term stability of implant-supported FDPs irrespective of the fit.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call