Accuracy and Efficacy of Impedance Cardiography as a Non-Invasive Cardiac Function Monitor.

Abstract

PurposeThe most common method of monitoring cardiac output (CO) is thermodilution using pulmonary artery catheter (PAC), but this method is associated with complications. Impedance cardiography (ICG) is a non-invasive CO monitoring technique. This study compared the accuracy and efficacy of ICG as a non-invasive cardiac function monitoring technique to those of thermodilution and arterial pressure contour.Materials and MethodsSixteen patients undergoing liver transplantation were included. Cardiac index (CI) was measured by thermodilution using PAC, arterial waveform analysis, and ICG simultaneously in each patient. Statistical analysis was performed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis to assess the degree of agreement.ResultsThe difference by thermodilution and ICG was 1.13 L/min/m2, and the limits of agreement were −0.93 and 3.20 L/min/m2. The difference by thermodilution and arterial pressure contour was 0.62 L/min/m2, and the limits of agreement were −1.43 and 2.67 L/min/m2. The difference by arterial pressure contour and ICG was 0.50 L/min/m2, and the limits of agreement were −1.32 and 2.32 L/min/m2. All three percentage errors exceeded the 30% limit of acceptance. Substantial agreement was observed between CI of thermodilution with PAC and ICG at preanhepatic and anhepatic phases, as well as between CI of thermodilution and arterial waveform analysis at preanhepatic phase. Others showed moderate agreement.ConclusionAlthough neither method was clinically equivalent to thermodilution, ICG showed more substantial correlation with thermodilution method than with arterial waveform analysis. As a non-invasive cardiac function monitor, ICG would likely require further studies in other settings.