Abstract
This study aims to compare and analyze the difference between AAOIFI standards and PSAK 111. The method used in this study in content analysis. This study found that AAOIFI standards cover almost all of the areas covered under PSAK 111. However, AAOIFI standards are argued to be more holistic, focused and specific compared to PSAK 111. AAOIFI tends to encourage takaful operators to use wakalah model. Pro-forma Statement of policyholders’ surplus and deficit in FAS 12 only recognized the distribution of underwriting surplus to policyholders, while PSAK 111 recognized distribution both to policyholders and takaful operators. PSAK 111 recognized modified wakalah model for takaful operators. Consequently, Pro-forma Income statement in FAS 12 only recognized three sources of revenue of takaful operators. They are investment revenue (from shareholder’s equity), wakalah fee (ujrah) and profit-sharing investment (from policyholder’s fund), while PSAK 111 also included income from distribution of underwriting surplus.
 Keywords: Accounting Practices, Takaful Operators, AAOIFI, PSAK 111
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Proceedings of International Conference on Economics Business and Government Challenges
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
