Abstract

A central feature in the montage of executing the internal audit, in a non-forensic context, is a random sample of sufficient size to create the evidence needed to decide whether extended investigative procedures are warranted. This is critical not only in maintaining a best practices profile for the department of internal auditing but also in “partnering” with the external auditors by assuring, in so far as possible, that the work of the internal audit group can be accepted as audit evidence by the external auditors and so conserving scarce organizational resources. In fact, this partnering is one of the long-term goals of the PCAOB for controlling the cost of the external certification audit. However, a contentious issue in sampling is: How should the internal auditor ferret out those accounts that are likely candidates for discovery sampling? This is the point of departure of our paper where we present a simple and validated protocol based upon the digital frequency paradigm introduced by Newcomb & Benford and popularized in the audit context by Nigrini to: identify accounts under audit that seem reasonable candidates for extended procedures discovery sampling testing. The protocol centers around a triage-point in Cartesian space developed from samples of account profiles reported in the literature. We validated the logic of the protocol by using a holdback sample. Finally, we have coded the account identification protocol as a Decision Support System in VBA: ExcelÔ that is available from the authors for free without restriction to its use. 
 JEL Code: M4

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call