Abstract

The principle of separation of powers and the fear of entering into political issues or affecting the powers of other Powers of Government, remain as one of the most frequent reasons for the rejection of the writs of mandamus against the Government. In this piece, starting from a real case, the errors of those motives are analyzed and it concludes in the correct solution from the point of view of the Constitutional Law in force.

Highlights

  • Palabras clave: acción de amparo, principio de separación de poderes, rol del juez, protección de derechos humanos

  • The principle of separation of powers and the fear of entering into political issues or affecting the powers of other Powers of Government, remain as one of the most frequent reasons for the rejection of the writs of mandamus against the Government. In this piece, starting from a real case, the errors of those motives are analyzed and it concludes in the correct solution from the point of view of the Constitutional Law in force

  • Partindo de um caso real, são analisados os erros dos referidos motivos e conclui-se qual é a solução correta desde o ponto de vista do Direito Constitucional vigente

Read more

Summary

Martín Risso FerrandÄ

Acción de amparo sobre el acceso a los servicios de comunicación audiovisual de personas con discapacidad auditiva “Writ of mandamus” on the access to audiovisual communication services for people with a hearing impairment. Resumen: El principio de separación de poderes, y el temor de ingresar en temas políticos o afectar las competencias de otros poderes, siguen siendo algunos de los motivos más frecuentes para el rechazo de acciones de amparo contra el Estado. Partiendo de un caso real, se analizan los errores de dichos motivos y se concluye en cuál es la solución correcta desde el punto de vista del Derecho Constitucional vigente. Palabras clave: acción de amparo, principio de separación de poderes, rol del juez, protección de derechos humanos

Martín Risso Ferrand
El caso
La sentencia en estudio
Plan de análisis
El principio de separación de poderes
El plazo de caducidad en el caso en estudio
Conclusión

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.