Abstract

This paper evaluates the Car Allowance Rebate System (CARS ) by comparing the vehicle purchases and disposals of households with eligible “clunkers” to those of households with similar but ineligible vehicles. CARS caused roughly 500,000 purchases during the program period. The provision of liquidity, through a rebate usable as a down payment, was critical in generating this large response. Participation was rare among households that owned clunkers with outstanding loans, which required loan repayment. This decline in participation is attributed to households’ preference for lower down payments and distinguished from the effects of income, other indebtedness, and the program subsidy. (JEL E23, E62, G51, H24, H31)

Highlights

  • The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available

  • We study the Car Allowance Rebate System (CARS) program to understand the importance of financial frictions for the impact and design of this type of fiscal stimulus program

  • The differential response is specific to loans secured by the potential ­trade-in: we find no difference in program response for households with other outstanding loans, presumably because these debts are not due upon participation in CARS

Read more

Summary

Related Literature

Our paper relates to the literatures on fiscal stimulus, household financial constraints, and purchases of durable goods. Vehicle purchases in particular seem to follow from substantial increases in household liquidity, as caused by cash stimulus payments (Parker et al 2013), minimum wage hikes (Aaronson, Agarwal, and French 2012), and tax refunds (Adams, Einav, and Levin 2009). The paper shows that CARS caused owners of ­just-eligible vehicles to purchase more ­fuel-efficient but smaller and substantially less expensive vehicles. Their estimates imply that CARS reduced aggregate vehicle spending despite inducing an initial increase in spending and purchases at the time of the program. Since the response of owners of 1­ 8-MPG vehicles may not be representative of the response of all owners, we measure the average impact of the program using a wider range of fuel efficiencies

Overview
Program Eligibility
Program Credit and Economic Subsidy
MPG 2 MPG or more
Data Sources
Sample and Methodology
Average Impact
Economic Subsidy
Household Financial Conditions
Intertemporal Substitution
Placebo Tests and Robustness
Findings
Conclusion and Discussion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.