Abstract

• A finite element (FE) method is proposed to accelerate high-fidelity scanwise thermal process simulation in laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) • Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) thermal fields are predicted by a dimensionality reduction based deep learning framework • Predicted thermal fields are imposed on the finite element (FE) solution domain within a relatively small region encompassing the melt pool, while heat diffusion effects elsewhere are solved via the FE method • The FE solution precisely matches the CFD solution across all melting regimes • The FE model running on a GPU card with 4,608 CUDA cores is 28.2x more efficient than the CFD simulations running on 24 CPU cores in parallel The current work proposes a finite element method (FEM) to accelerate scanwise thermal process simulation of the laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) process with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) resolution near the melt pool. Termed the CFD imposed FEM (CIFEM), the transient thermal fields from a high-fidelity CFD simulation and inferred by deep learning are imposed as temperature values rather than utilizing a conventional heat source model as in existing FEM-based process simulations. These fields are enforced only within a relatively small computational region encompassing the melt pool, while heat diffusion effects elsewhere are solved via the FEM. For a wide range of laser power and scan speeds covering the conduction, transition, and keyhole melting regimes, 29 of the 30 total CIFEM-simulated melt pool sizes lie within two standard deviations of the experimental melt pool sizes. Compared with the CFD simulations, the thermal fields obtained by CIFEM possess 7.44% mean absolute relative error (MARE), significantly less than the 43.76% MARE on three representative test cases simulated using the Goldak heat source model calibrated to the measured melt pool dimensions. In terms of computational efficiency, the CIFEM model running on a GPU card with 4,608 Compute Unified Device Architecture (CUDA) cores is 28.2x more efficient than the CFD simulations running on 24 CPU cores in parallel.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call