Abstract

Participatory methods in disaster research and disaster risk reduction are increasingly used by non-governmental organizations (NGOs), government agencies, and academics. The three key principles of participatory research are: (a) empowering the powerless, (b) instigating changes at policy level, and (c) generating sustainable solutions that match with local communities' needs. Yet, academic research is inherently extractive and local people are generally not involved in the research project design and objectives, nor in the assessment of the research outcomes. Reflecting upon fieldwork done with disaster-affected communities, this article analyses the difficulties and limitations faced during the participatory process and challenges the capacity of participatory research, when carried out in an academic context, to generate these three key principles. It is concluded that there is need for more accountability of academics towards local communities, and greater involvement of the participants within the data collection and analysis process.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.