Abusive Metajournalistic Discourse Towards Journalists on Social Media

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this study, we used a mixed method approach to investigate online abuse mostly targeting journalists, by focusing on the use of the term presstitute. We inductively analyzed the professional categories of the targeted people, whether be journalists, news organizations, politicians, etc., and the countries where these professionals live. Our findings show that Twitter was the most active platform for attacking journalists, and that the top targeted groups were Indian journalists followed by American and Filipino ones. Building on Metajournalistic Discourse theory, we introduce the concept of Abusive Metajournalistic Discourse (AMD) as a form of reactive discourse, and we argue that using the term presstitute is one manifestation of AMD. To corroborate our findings, we used the collected datasets to identify the journalists who are being trolled with different types of abusive content and interviewed 12 journalists through semi-structured interviews in order to elicit their views on the abusive content targeting them. Five themes emerged from these interviews including: (1) cloaked coordinated AMD; (2) hyper-nationalist, racist and sexist AMD; (3) state-sanctioned AMD and disinformation; (4) journalists’ resolve and resilience; and (5) sinister AMD outcomes, which help shed light on the impact of AMD on journalism practice.