Abstract
This theoretical article is concerned with diachronic discourse processes. In particular it explores the following hypothesis: The origin of an abstract term lies in the function of summarising, or standing in place of, a narrative or narratives. The meaning of an abstraction is to be found ultimately in the kinds of stories from which it emerged. Abstraction is thus an inter-textual phenomenon. The article is based on a distinction that is drawn between coherence and adherence, the former pertaining to intra-textual relations and the latter pertaining to inter-textual relations. Inter-textual relations emerge over time. Texts cohere globally through macro-propositions, which are a form of summary representation; but texts also adhere to one another, which they do by sharing macro-propositions. Certain of those macro-propositions may themselves become summarised as an abstract concept, so that the abstract nominal becomes a summary representation of a body of discourse (i.e. larger than a single text). The contested and problematic nature of meaning in the case of hyper-abstract concepts arises from the relationships between their use and the prior discourse from which they are derived and which they may evoke in complex and unpredictable ways.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.