Abstract WP10: Impact of Prior Intravenous Thrombolysis on the Outcome of Emergent Carotid Stenting in Acute Stroke Patients With Tandem Occlusion: A Collaborative Pooled Analysis

Abstract

Background: Acute tandem occlusion (ATO) management is technically challenging and was not sufficiently evaluated in trials. There is evidence suggesting the efficacy and safety of emergent carotid stenting in conjunction with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for ATO treatment. However, the safety of carotid stenting (CS) post intravenous tPA (IVT) treatment remains unclear. Objective: to report the safety and functional outcomes of emergent CS post IVT, and compare it to non-IVT patients. Methods: This was a retrospective multicenter international TITAN collaboration including 18 endovascular databases. In the present analysis, patients were included if they presented with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to ATO and were treated with CS in conjunction with MT. ATO was defined as an extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) lesion (complete occlusion or stenosis >=90%) and an intracranial proximal occlusion (distal ICA and/or first or second segment of the middle cerebral artery). Outcome measures included final mTICI score, 90 day-modified Rankin Scale (mRS), mortality, procedural complications, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Mixed effects logistic model was used to determine the predictors of each outcome Results: Among 454 patients with ATO, 289 were treated with CS and included in the present analysis. One hundred seventy-five patients (60%) of the included patients received IVT prior to MT. Onset to groin was shorter in the IVT group (259 ±251 vs. 353±238; p=0.013). Otherwise, there was no difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Heparin use during procedure was less in IVT group (20% vs. 54%; p<0.001). With respect to the outcome, there was no significant difference in the rate of successful recanalization (mTICI 2b-3), complete recanalization (mTICI 3), and favorable outcome (90-day mRS 0-2) between two groups. In addition, there was no difference in rate of sICH or procedural complications between two groups. In a mixed logistic regression model adjusting for potential confounders, IVT was not a predictor of sICH, successful recanalization or favorable outcome. Conclusion: Emergent CS in association with MT after IVT was safe and was not associated with an increased risk of sICH or procedural complications.