Abstract P4-19-05: Efficacy of screening and treatment of breast cancer patients reporting high level of distress

Abstract

Abstract Background: Cancer patients (pts) are burdened by symptoms related to the disease itself or to the toxicities of treatment. A recent meta-analysis has shown that anxiety is the most common mental health issue among cancer survivors [Mitchell AJ, 2013]. The ASCO clinical oncology guideline adaptation recommends all health care providers routinely screen for the presence of emotional distress and symptoms of anxiety from the point of diagnosis onward [Andersen BL, 2014]. Consensus-based recommendations have been published to help cancer centers meet the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer's accreditation requirement to screen for distress [Pirl, 2014] At our comprehensive community cancer center we perform distress screening using the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI), composed of 27 questions. Pts who report moderate and severe levels of distress (≥5) on the MDASI are identified and referred for therapeutic interventions offered by the facility's integrative oncology services. Materials and Methods: The MDASI is an assessment tool that captures pts' perceived symptom burden for real-time clinical intervention, taken at the point of no intervention (baseline) and every 21 days or greater. The 27-question MDASI is comprised of the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI), a validated 19-item assessment instrument, with a Symptom Inventory Tool (SIT) added by our center of 8 questions and a free-text box. Symptoms are rated “at the worst” on an 11-point numeric scale ranging from 0 (“none present”) to 10 (“as bad as you can imagine”), as experienced by the patient in the past 24 hours. Results: Over a ten-month period (9/1/2014 to 6/30/2015), 247 breast cancer (BC) pts completed the MDASI at intake and again ≥ 21 days after. Analysis of their initial surveys identified 69 pts (27.9%) who rated their distress as ≥ 5 (1st MDASI mean = 6.83), scores which would have initiated a support system response with referrals to integrative medicine services for intervention. Second MDASI results from these 69 BC pts revealed an average 2.29 distress score reduction (2nd MDASI mean = 4.48), with 51 pts (73.9%) reporting a decrease in distress, 7 pts (10.1%) having no change, and 11 pts (15.9%) reporting increased distress. More specifically, the group with decreased distress levels documented a mean distress score of 3 on their 2nd MDASI, averaging a significant 4-point diminution of distress for three-fourths of the BC pts heavily burdened by this symptom. The integrative services most utilized by these pts were Nutrition Therapy (100%), Spiritual Care (96.1%), Mind-Body Counseling (82.4%), Rehabilitation Therapy (41.2%), Acupuncture (35.3%), and Massage Therapy (35.3%). Conclusions: Distress is a relevant symptom reported by cancer pts. This study demonstrates that early intervention in BC pts using integrative oncology approaches reduced distress in 74% of cases. Citation Format: Daneker SR, Bendinger GM, Thomas JW, Smith E, Kendrick D, Hartman S, Gordon C, Barber K, Langlois C, Pabbathi H, McKnight JE, Johnson AT, Lammersfeld C, Denny D, Markman M, Alvarez RH. Efficacy of screening and treatment of breast cancer patients reporting high level of distress [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-19-05.