Abstract P3-09-05: Genomic and clinical characterization of breast tumors with unusual HER2 FISH pattern (ratio < 2, HER2 copy number ≥ 6): Are they mostly HER2 “positive?”

Abstract

Abstract Background: Breast tumors with HER2/CEP17 fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) ratio < 2 and HER2 copy number ≥ 6, defined as Group 3 FISH pattern by the 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 testing guidelines, are clinically rare. Their biologic and molecular characteristics are under-characterized. They require only a concomitant HER2 immunohistochemistry score of at least 2+ to merit HER2 “positive” status by the ASCO/CAP guidelines. We seek to characterize the genomic and tumor microenvironment landscape of breast tumors with this unique HER2 FISH pattern. Our second aim is to assess the clinicopathologic features with emphasis on HER2-targeted therapy response.Method: Breast cancers with Group 3 FISH pattern were evaluated by the following methods: 1) High-resolution genome-wide copy number alterations by molecular inversion probe (MIP) array; 2) molecular profiling of tumor immune microenvironment, tumor signaling pathways, and PAM50-based intrinsic subtypes by Nanostring nCounter Breast Cancer 360 Panel; 3) tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) histologic quantitation, and 4) clinical chart review. Classically amplified HER2 breast tumors (Group 1 FISH pattern; ratio ≥ 2 and HER2 copy number ≥ 2) were used as comparison. Results: Thirty-five (1.3%) cases were identified from 2731 consecutive clinical cases that underwent HER2 FISH testing from 2014 to 2019. Of those, thirteen consecutive cases (spanning 2014 - 2017) with sufficient genomic material were analyzed using MIP array. Group 3 tumors had a more complex karyotype and greater chromosomal instability, compared to classically amplified HER2 breast tumors. None of the Group 3 tumors showed HER2 locus amplification at 17q12. Instead, most showed gain of the 17q arm. Six of the Group 3 tumors were profiled by Nanostring nCounter. Compared to HER2 classically amplified tumors, Group 3 tumors were more immune cold, enriched in ER signaling and TGF-beta signaling pathways. In contrast, HER2 classically amplified tumors were enriched in immune infiltration, cytokine and chemokine signaling, PI3K and MAPK signaling, epithelial-mesenchymal transition signaling, and proliferation (P < 0.5 for all). PAM50 analysis showed that classically amplified tumors were more enriched for HER2-subtype (2/4; 50%), while the majority of the Group 3 tumors were enriched for Luminal B-subtype (5/6; 83%). TIL percentage was statistically higher in HER2 classically amplified tumors compare to Group 3 tumors (avg 53% vs 3%; P = 0.02). Clinicopathologic correlation revealed a high rate of ER positivity and high tumor grade in Group 3 tumors. Group 3 FISH pattern can occur as de novo or in the context of FISH status change following therapy. In the 17 evaluable patients for HER2-targeted treatment efficacy, none of the eight patients who received HER2-targeted neoadjuvant therapy achieved complete pathologic response. Nine of ten patients who received TDM-1 in the metastatic setting progressed with minimal treatment response. Significantly, most of these patients (16/17; 94%) were considered overall HER2 positive by the latest ASCO/CAP guideline. Conclusion: Breast tumors with Group 3 HER2 FISH pattern are molecularly and clinically dissimilar from classically amplified HER2 positive breast tumors. HER2-targeted therapy did not appear efficacious in either the neoadjuvant or metastatic/recurrent settings. The lack of apparent efficacy of HER2-targeted therapy, in the context of their HER2 positive status by the current HER2 guideline assessment, warrants further investigation of this HER2 FISH subtype. Citation Format: Christina H Wei, Lixin Yang, Daphne Stewart, Victoria Bedell, Daniel Schmolze, Sophia Apple, Joyce L. Murata-Collins, Raju Pillai, Joanne E. Mortimer. Genomic and clinical characterization of breast tumors with unusual HER2 FISH pattern (ratio < 2, HER2 copy number ≥ 6): Are they mostly HER2 “positive?” [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-09-05.