Abstract P2-08-58: Prognostic factors of survival in node positive breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in a large series after 5y follow-up: Can response overcome the poor prognosis of nodal stage?

Abstract

Abstract Background: Status of the axilla is one of the most significant prognostic factors in breast cancer (BC) patients. On the other hand, response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is related to survival. The aim of the present study is to analyze which prognostic factors impact most on Node positive (N+) BC patient survival after NATC. Material and methods: Retrospective analyses on a series of N+ BC patients treated with NATC based on anthracyclines and taxanes +/- trastuzumab if HER2 positive tumors, between June 2008 and December 2016. Clinical, radiological and pathological outcomes have been evaluated. Residual cancer burden (RCB) 1 and the neoadjuvant response index (INR) 2 have been recorded. Survival was calculated with Kaplan-Meier survival curve since the start of NATC to the first documented disease recurrence (DFS) or death (OS). Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were estimated with cox proportional hazards regression analysis and subgroups were compared with a two-sided log-rank test. Results: A total of 345 N+ BC patients were included. Pathological complete response was achieved in 72 (20.8%) patients. After NACT, 137 (39.6%) become ypN0, 9 (2.6%) ypN1 mic, 113 (32.7%) ypN1, 60 (17.3%) ypN2 and 26 (7.6%) N3. Those independent predictive factor of ypN0 were molecular subtype (TN and Her2+) with OR: 7.7, p<0.001 and clinical response with OR 6.88, p: 0.04. At a mean follow-up of 58 months there have been 73 (21.1%) recurrences: 9 (2.3%) local, 45 (13%) systemic, 15 (4.3%) systemic+ local, 3 (0.9%) axilla, 1 (0.3%) supraclavicular. The estimated 5y OS was 87.8%. The univariate analysis according to DSF is detailed in Table1. Adjusted univariate anaalysis cox regression of clinical and pathological factors of desease free survivalBMI10.989-1.010.963AGE0.9960.953-1.0420.876Dose NATC0.9940.979-1.0080.402Clinical Stage1.4021.077-1.8260.012Rx Image1.260.803-1.9940.311Rx size1.0090.995-1.0240.217Number suspicious ALN1.0950.801-1.4970.57Molecular subtype TN,HER20.8800.534-1.450.616Nottinghan grade1.0460.753-1.4530.789Histological subtype1.4651.044-2.0570.27MOlecular subtype1.1510.956-1.3850.137Vascular invasion1.6761.137-24710.009Clinical response2.3691.709-3.284<0.001Fibrosis tumor bed0.980.972-0.989<0.001Nodal fibrosis>50%1.7950.874-3.6860.111Pathological tumoral response1.6861.175-2.4180.005ypN03.561.853-6.838<0.001NRI0.330.192-0.565<0.001RCB1.2741.106-1.4680.001 In the multivariate model those parameters that were independently prognostic were clinical response HR: 5.44 (IC95% 2.275-13.042, p<0.001) and clinical stage HR: 2.364 (IC95% 1.018-5.490, p: 0.045). Conclusions: The most significant prognostic factor in our N+ series was response to NATC, followed by clinical stage. Those independently predictive factors of axillar response (ypN0) were molecular subtype (TN and Her2+) and clinical response. In conclusion, in those patients with chemo sensitive tumors, lymphadenectomy could be safely spared with a more selective axillary approach. Citation Format: Fernandez S, Garcia A, Vethencourt A, Vazquez S, Petit A, Pla MJ, Ortega R, Pérez J, Gil M, Ponce J, Pernas S, Lopez A, Falo C. Prognostic factors of survival in node positive breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in a large series after 5y follow-up: Can response overcome the poor prognosis of nodal stage? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-08-58.