Abstract

Abstract Background: Amplification or overexpression of HER2 has been shown to play an important role in approximately 30% of breast cancers and is strongly associated with increased recurrence and a worse prognosis. The HER2 extracellular domain (ECD) may be cleaved and shed from the surface of breast cancer cells and serum HER2 ECD levels can be detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). In this study, we explored the relationship between circulating HER2 ECD and tissue HER2 status, then we also examined its predictive value in a cohort of metastatic breast cancer patients. Methods: Two hundred and seven metastatic breast cancer patients from March 2009 to July 2011 were involved in this prospective study at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital. The patients were identified histopathologically as having breast cancer by pathologists and staged mainly based on the pathology, the clinical manifestation, and the imaging findings of CT and MRI according to the classification system of the International Union Against Cancer. Serum HER2 ECD levels were measured by ELISA. Tissue HER2 was determined by IHC and FISH in tumor samples, respectively. Results: The level of serum HER2 ECD was at least more than 15 ng/ml in 31.4% (65/207) metastatic breast cancer patients, 39.1%(43/110) in HER2-positive patients and 23.4%(22/94) in HER2-negative cases, respectively, P = 0.017. We also found that high serum HER2 ECD levels (≥15 ng/ml) were significantly associated with elevated serum CEA (52.1% v 21.5%, OR 3.978, 95%CI 2.138–7.401, P = 0.000), CA125 (48.5% v 23.5%, OR 3.064, 95%CI 1.650–5.691, P = 0.000), CA153 (53.2% v 17.1%, OR 5.48, 95%CI 2.897–10.366, P = 0.000), LDH (53.3% v 23.1%, OR 3.798, 95%CI 2.011–7.173, P = 0.000) and AKP (51.2% v 26.5%, OR 2.911, 95%CI 1.442–5.879, P = 0.002), respectively. For the effect of HER2 ECD on the site of relapse, still there were statistically significant correlation between increased serum HER2 ECD levels and liver involvement (42.7% v 24.0%, OR 2.358, 95%CI 1.294–4.297, P = 0.005), brain metastasis (50.0% v 26.7%, OR 2.744, 95%CI 1.397–5.391, P = 0.003) and visceral involved (37.9% v 14.8%, OR 3.511, 95%CI 1.548–7.961, P = 0.002), respectively. While serum HER2 ECD levels were not related to age, BMI, tumor size, lymph node involvement and hormone receptors status, respectively (P>0.05). Conclusions: Monitoring the circulating levels of the HER2 ECD in patients with metastatic breast cancer provides a real-time assessment of tumor burden and indicates poor prognosis, and may provide important information for reassessment of HER2 in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-05-05.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call