Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Implant-based breast reconstruction is the most common type of reconstruction following post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). The impact of the timing of PMRT to a tissue expander or permanent implant is not well understood. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate outcomes in implant-based reconstruction and the timing of PMRT. METHODS: A review of the English literature in the PubMed/MEDLINE database (2000–2016) was performed to identify all manuscripts on implant-based breast reconstruction and PMRT. Cases from each study were grouped by PMRT to a tissue expander or PMRT to a permanent implant. Outcomes of interest included reconstructive failure and capsular contracture as overall rates and associations were pooled. Effect sizes (z-values), risk ratios (RRs), and heterogeneity scores (I2) were calculated on meta-analysis. RESULTS: There were 20 studies meeting inclusion criteria with 2,348 patients identified. Pooled analysis revealed an overall rate of reconstructive failure of 17.6% and Baker grade III / IV capsular contracture of 37.5%. PMRT applied to tissue expanders resulted in higher rates of reconstructive failure compared to PMRT applied to permanent silicone implants (20% vs. 13.4%, RR = 2.33, p = 0.0083, 95% CI 1.24 – 4.35), but lower rates of capsular contracture (24.5% vs. 49.4%, RR = 0.53, p = 0.083, 95% CI 0.26 – 1.09). CONCLUSION: Regardless of timing, PMRT applied to implant-based breast reconstruction was associated with high risk of reconstructive failure and capsular contracture. Surgeons should consider alternative strategies, such as autologous tissue reconstructions, in patients requiring PMRT.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call