Abstract
Abstract Nanoscale drug delivery systems have enormous potential to leverage innovative chemistry and encapsulate a wide range of cargo. However, compared to the large number and diverse scope of nanoscale systems described in preclinical manuscripts, there are relatively few approved drug products representing a narrow range of chemistries. There are many reasons for this translational gap, ranging from manufacturing and regulatory challenges to clinical relevance and safety. This presentation outlines key strategies to address the multifaceted challenges that hinder the clinical adoption of nanoscale drug delivery systems. One of the first barriers is the difficulty of scaling up the production of nanoscale systems while maintaining quality and consistency. An illustrative case study will be shared of an approved nanotherapeutic becoming unavailable due to manufacturing concerns, and the resultant change in clinical practice. For a new investigational agent, the work required to optimize a promising nanoformulation is time-consuming and may not result in immediate, publishable findings, creating tension between essential translational work and projects more likely to yield high-profile publications and contribute to academic promotion. In the industry setting, successfully navigating this hurdle is likely to require significant capital, again without a guarantee of success. Without a stable and robust formulation that can be scaled for good manufacturing practice, the benefits of an innovative formulation cannot be fully realized. Another key principle underlying successful translation is identifying a clear clinical indication, which will guide clinical trial design and improve the likelihood of regulatory approval. Recent data suggest that national research funding trends heavily influence the focus of nanotechnology studies, resulting in a misalignment between clinical needs and the investigational agents being developed. In the future, a funding re-alignment may open additional opportunities for basket trials in patient populations lacking a standard of care, or in diseases where the current treatment options are highly toxic. Expanding the clinical indications for nanotherapeutics will likely require academic-industry partnerships to bring together a robust drug product and a strong clinical rationale. The regulatory process for nanoscale therapeutics is evolving, making early communication between investigators and regulators crucial for successfully transitioning nanoscale drug delivery systems from the lab to clinical use for cancer patients. Citation Format: Joelle P. Straehla. Strategies to close the translational gap for nanoscale drug delivery systems [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Optimizing Therapeutic Efficacy and Tolerability through Cancer Chemistry; 2024 Dec 9-11; Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2024;23(12_Suppl):Abstract nr IA011.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.