Abstract

Electrophysiological research has isolated neural signatures of decision formation in a variety of brain regions. Studies in rodents and monkeys have focused primarily on effector-selective signals that translate the emerging decision into a specific motor plan, but, more recently, research on the human brain has identified an abstract signature of evidence accumulation that does not appear to play any direct role in action preparation. The functional dissociations between these distinct signal types have only begun to be characterized, and their dynamics during decisions with deferred actions with or without foreknowledge of stimulus-effector mapping, a commonly studied task scenario in single-unit and functional imaging investigations, have not been established. Here we traced the dynamics of distinct abstract and effector-selective decision signals in the form of the broad-band centro-parietal positivity (CPP) and limb-selective β-band (8-16 and 18-30 Hz) EEG activity, respectively, during delayed-reported motion direction decisions with and without foreknowledge of direction-response mapping. With foreknowledge, the CPP and β-band signals exhibited a similar gradual build-up following evidence onset, but whereas choice-predictive β-band activity persisted up until the delayed response, the CPP dropped toward baseline after peaking. Without foreknowledge, the CPP exhibited identical dynamics, whereas choice-selective β-band activity was eliminated. These findings highlight qualitative functional distinctions between effector-selective and abstract decision signals and are of relevance to the assumptions founding functional neuroimaging investigations of decision-making. Neural signatures of evidence accumulation have been isolated in numerous brain regions. Although animal neurophysiology has largely concentrated on effector-selective decision signals that translate the emerging decision into a specific motor plan, recent research on the human brain has isolated abstract neural signatures of decision formation that are independent of specific sensory and motor requirements. Here, we examine the functional distinctions between the two distinct classes of decision variable signal during decisions with deferred actions with and without foreknowledge of stimulus-effector mapping. We find salient distinctions in the dynamics of abstract versus effector-selective decision signals in the human brain, in terms of sustainment through response delays and contingency on foreknowledge of stimulus-response mapping.

Highlights

  • Single-unit recordings in rodents and monkeys have identified neural populations whose spiking activity integrates sensory evidence during perceptual decision formation and triggers the decision-reporting action upon reaching a threshold level (Shadlen and Kiani, 2013)

  • Studies in rodents and monkeys have focused primarily on effector-selective signals that translate the emerging decision into a specific motor plan, but, more recently, research on the human brain has identified an abstract signature of evidence accumulation that does not appear to play any direct role in action preparation

  • Foreknowledge of stimulus-effector mapping differentially impacts upon abstract and effector-selective decision signals To explore the influence that foreknowledge of S-E mapping has on neural signatures of decision formation, we collapsed each participant’s trials across levels of coherence and plotted the average signal time courses aligned to the onset of coherent motion, the cue and response execution for each mapping condition separately (Fig. 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Single-unit recordings in rodents and monkeys have identified neural populations whose spiking activity integrates sensory evidence during perceptual decision formation and triggers the decision-reporting action upon reaching a threshold level (Shadlen and Kiani, 2013). Received Nov. 18, 2015; revised April 5, 2016; accepted April 9, 2016. D.M.T., S.P.K., and R.G.O. analyzed data; D.M.T., S.P.K., and R.G.O. wrote the paper. D.M.T., U.S National Science Foundation Grant BCS-1358955 to S.P.K. and R.O.C., and European Research Council, European Union’s Horizon 2020 Framework Programme Grant 63829 to R.O.C. We thank Alberto Umilta and Cian Judd for assistance with data collection. The authors declare no competing financial interests

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call