Abstract A002: The utility of pre-clinical trials in glioblastoma patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) models for informing clinical trial development of therapeutic strategies

Abstract

Abstract Large PDX collections provide broad representation of tumor genetics and are commonly used to evaluate the clinical potential of novel therapeutic strategies. In many solid malignancies, profound benefit in PDX preclinical studies has foreshadowed eventual FDA approval of clinically impactful therapeutics. With a lack of corresponding progress in glioblastoma (GBM), the value of PDX testing has been questioned. Mayo Clinic has developed 111 GBM PDXs from newly diagnosed (72 PDX) and recurrent (39 PDX) patients, and over the past 23 years, we have used this collection for extensive in vivo preclinical testing of 145 drugs in both orthotopic and heterotopic settings. As part of this work, the impact of standard of care therapy with temozolomide (TMZ) and bevacizumab was evaluated in orthotopic models using clinically relevant dosing regimens. For each animal study, the ratio of median survival for treated vs. control animals were used to define a ‘survival ratio’ as a normalized metric of benefit. TMZ efficacy was evaluated in 26 newly diagnosed GBM PDXs, with equal representation of MGMT methylated and unmethylated tumors. As expected, MGMT methylated PDXs were much more sensitive to TMZ as compared to unmethylated PDXs (median survival ratio 4.47 vs 1.48, respectively), and similar to clinical experience, 2 MGMT unmethylated PDXs were markedly sensitive to TMZ, while 1 MGMT methylated PDX was relatively resistant. In a more limited study, dose-dense vs. standard TMZ dosing was compared in 7 PDXs (4 MGMT methylated, 3 MGMT unmethylated). In a pooled analysis of all lines, both standard (HR=0.09; 95% CI: 0.06–0.14) and dose-dense TMZ therapy (HR=0.09; 95% CI: 0.06–0.14) were superior to vehicle controls (p<0.001). Similar to the clinical results in the Phase III randomized RTOG 0525 trial, survival with the dose-dense TMZ was no different than standard dosing (p=0.88, HR=0.98; 95% CI: 0.72-1.32). In an analysis of bevacizumab across 32 PDXs, mice were dosed once a week until moribund, and a minimum overall median survival benefit of 20% was used to define ‘responders’. Thirteen PDXs met this criterion, although the overall survival ratio among this subset was limited (range 1.21-1.65). Only 2 models had a 50% or greater survival benefit. Stratification by disease state (24 newly diagnosed vs 8 recurrent) showed equivalent performance (median survival benefit 1.13 for both). These results are consistent with the limited survival benefit observed with bevacizumab and the RTOG 0825 clinical trial. In summary, the results from these relatively inexpensive PDX studies demonstrate the potential of pre-clinical PDX trials to evaluate the extent of benefit and fraction of responsive PDXs to a novel therapeutic. If analyzed across an ‘adequate’ number of PDXs, these results potentially can be used to identify predictive biomarkers or to compare various treatment regimens prior to clinical testing. Citation Format: Danielle M Burgenske, Ann C Mladek, Katrina K Bakken, Zeng Hu, Brett L Carlson, Paul A Decker, Jeanette E Eckel-Passow, Jann N Sarkaria. The utility of pre-clinical trials in glioblastoma patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) models for informing clinical trial development of therapeutic strategies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2023 Oct 11-15; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2023;22(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A002.