Abstract 4135194: Safety and Efficacy of Mechanical Circulatory Support during VT ablation

Abstract

Introduction: Ventricular arrythmias are prevalent in patients with advanced heart failure and associated with increased mortality. Outcomes of electrophysiology ablation on patients requiring mechanical circulatory support (MCS) are not well described. We aimed to analyze the safety and efficacy of ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation in patients requiring MCS at the Emory system. Methods: Patients were identified via retrospective chart review from October 2022 through August 2023. Patients who underwent VT ablation with the support of Impella, left ventricular assist device (LVAD), intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), and venoarterial extra-corpeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO), or any combination of these were included. Results: A total of 7 patients of average age 56 ± 10 years, predominantly male (85.7%), with cardiomyopathy of mean EF 18.6% +/- 8.5 (ischemic 71.4%) underwent MCS supported VT ablation. One patient had 2 separate VT ablation procedures for refractory VT. Of these 8 procedures, 4 utilized a single type of MCS (2 impella, 2 LVAD) while 4 used a second type of MCS in combination with an Impella (2 impella RP, 1 VA ECMO, 1 IABP). Success at time of ablation was present in 75% of cases. Average time of outpatient follow up was 82 ± 31 days. At time of follow up, 50% of patients remained free of VT or with a single VT episode not requiring implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shock. One patient had gone on to undergo successful heart transplantation. Procedural complications were noted in one patient, who suffered cardioembolic cerebrovascular accident (CVA) 2 days post-op. Transthoracic echo (TTE) 5 days post-op revealed LV mural thrombus as likely etiology of CVA. Conclusion: While there are no clear guidelines directing the use of MCS during VT ablation, our single academic institution experience suggests safety and feasibility of its use to support select, high risk cases.