Abstract

Background: Heart failure (HF) is a common, costly cause of hospitalization. Few studies have evaluated the long-term impact of electronic disease management (EDM) on HF care. We reported a mortality benefit among HF patients (pts) undergoing electronic daily weight assessment in the Weight Monitoring in Heart Failure (WHARF) trial. Using trial data on transplant-free survival, we evaluated whether the initial mortality benefit persisted after withdrawal of the EDM system. Methods: 280 pts from 16 HF centers in the US were randomized, during admission for NYHA III/IV HF, to receive usual HF care or HF care and the AlereNet TM system (Alere Medical, Reno, NV). Pts were followed for 6 months prior to removal of the system. Transplant-free mortality data were then examined over the next 50 months. Results: 138 pts received the EDM system and 142 received usual care. Mean age was 59+/−15 years; 68% male; 64% Caucasian; 75% had NYHA III HF. A 56.2% reduction in mortality was demonstrated for pts randomized to the EDM group (p<0.003). Continued Kaplan-Meier analysis, however, ultimately showed a withdrawal effect among those in this group. By approximately 8 months after removal of the EDM system, mortality rates between the groups were identical. In the early withdrawal phase, mortality among those removed from the technology appears higher. (Figure 1 ) Conclusions: The mortality benefit in the intervention arm did not persist on cessation of the EDM system. This withdrawal effect further supports the notion that technology-based weight monitoring offsets mortality among those with advanced HF. Additional research is warranted to determine the optimal duration of such EDM in HF care.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call