Abstract 242: Long-term Outcome Of Quality Of Life Related To Treatment And Observation In Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

Abstract

Introduction: Quality of life changes can occur following procedural interventions and subarachnoid hemorrhage in unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA). The International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms conducted quality of life assessment using the Mini-Mental State Exam, Rankin Score, and Barthel Index at baseline and the Telephone Interview Cognitive Status Exam (TICS), Rankin Score, and Barthel Index at follow-up. Hypothesis: The purpose of this analysis was to compare the 1 year and 5 year outcome in the treatment cohorts (surgery and endovascular) with those of the untreated subgroup. Methods: Patients were subdivided into the initial treated and untreated cohorts based upon observation or treatment practices in 61 centers from 1991-1998. 1691 patients were in the observational cohort and 2388 in the treated cohort. The cohorts were followed annually with measures of neurological status, Rankin Scale, Barthel Index and cognition (TICS). Outcomes were determined prospectively. Comparison of outcomes was done using continuous and categorical data. Covariate adjustment was done using general linear models. Stratified analysis was done by Rankin Score at the time of follow-up. Results: The percent of patients with a Barthel Index score of less than 60 at 1 year in the cohort was 9.4% (treated patients, 9.7%; untreated patients, 9.2%). The percent of patients at year 1 with a score of greater than 90 was 87.6%, 87.4% for treated patients and 87.8% for untreated patients. The percent of patients with a Barthel Index score of less than 60 at 5 years in the cohort was 41.4% (treated patients, 41.4%; untreated patients, 41.4%). The percent of patients at year 5 with a score of greater than 90 was 56.3%, 56.1% for treated patients and 56.5% for untreated patients. TICS and Barthel Index scores were significantly associated with each other for patients with Rankin Scores 0-2 (P<0.0001). This was seen at both year 1 and year 5 follow-up, but not for patients with Rankin Score 3-5. At both 1 year and 5 year follow-up, after controlling for Rankin Score, the distribution of Barthel Index scores of untreated patients and treated patients did not significantly differ. At both the 1 year follow-up, baseline Rankin Score, TICS and follow-up Rankin Score were significant predictors of Barthel Score (P<0.0001). At 5 years, only the follow-up Rankin Score was associated with Barthel Score (P<0.0001). Conclusions: Barthel Index Score decreased over time, but does not differ with treatment. The Rankin Score was the main predictor at follow-up of Barthel Index Score distribution.