Abstract
Introduction: There has been scant clinical evidence on whether the aquaretic effect of tolvaptan (TLV) contributes to decongestion without further renal impairment compared with furosemide (FUR). Methods: The Kanagawa Aquaresis Investigators Trial of TLV on Heart Failure Patients with Renal Impairment (K-STAR) is a multicenter, open-labeled, randomized, controlled prospective clinical study of 81 patients with heart failure (HF) in Japan. Patients with residual signs of congestion despite treatment with oral FUR at a dose of ≥40 mg/day with baseline estimated glomerular filtration rates of <45 mL/min were randomly assigned to two groups for 7-day treatments with either ≤15 mg/day of additive TLV or ≤40 mg/day of FUR. Results: During the treatment period, a more significant increase from baseline in urine volume (%ΔUV) was seen in the TLV group than in the FUR group (+42 ± 43% in the TLV group vs. +15 ± 39% in the FUR group, p < 0.01). Renal function was better preserved in the TLV group than in the FUR group [increase in serum creatinine (%ΔCr): +3 ± 13% in the TLV group vs. +10 ± 14% in the FUR group, p = 0.015]. Increases in the ratio of blood urea nitrogen to %ΔCr and %ΔUV were positively correlated in the FUR group (r = 0.33, p = 0.03) but were not significantly correlated in the TLV group (r = -0.15, p = 0.34). Moreover, an increase in pulse rate (%ΔPR: r = 0.31, p = 0.04) and decrease in stroke volume (%ΔSV: r = –0.35, p = 0.04) were positively correlated to the %ΔUV in the FUR group but not in the TLV group (%ΔPR: r = 0.10, p = 0.51; %ΔSV: r = –0.08, p = 0.65; respectively). Conclusions: TLV increases UV with less hemodynamic and renal impairment by maintaining adequate intravascular volume compared with FUR in HF patients with renal dysfunction.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have