Abstract
Objective: To study inpatient outcomes of infective endocarditis (IE) with concurrent heart blocks Introduction: IE complicated with heart blocks can have adverse outcomes and usually requires immediate surgical and cardiac interventions. Data on outcomes and trends in patients with IE with concurrent heart blocks are lacking. Methods: Patients with a principle diagnosis of IE with or without heart blocks were identified by querying the Healthcare Cost and Utilization (HCUP) database, specifically, the National Inpatient Sample for year 2013 and 2014 based on ICD9 codes. Results: During 2013 and 2014, a total of 18,733 patients were admitted with a diagnosis of IE, out of whom 867 had concurrent heart blocks. There was an increased in-hospital mortality (13% vs 10.3%), length of stay (19 vs 14 days), cost of care (282,573 vs 223,559), cardiogenic shock (8.9% vs 3.2%), placement of an ICD/CRT/PPM (30.6% vs 0.9%), acute kidney injury (40.1% vs 32.6%) and hematologic complications (19.3 vs 15.2%) in patients admitted with IE with heart blocks as compared to those with IE but without heart block. Infective endocarditis and concurrent heart block resulted in increased requirement for aortic (25.7 vs 6.1%) and mitral (17.3% vs 4.2%) valvular replacements as compared to IE without heart block. Conclusions: IE with concurrent heart block worsens in-hospital mortality, length and cost of hospital stay. Our analysis clearly demonstrates an increase in the indications for cardiac procedures, specifically aortic and/or mitral valve replacements and ICD/CRT/PPM placement. A close tele monitoring system and prompt interventions may represent a significant mitigation strategy to avoid adverse outcomes observed in this study.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.