Abstract 13623: In Silico Comparison of Pressure Head Loss for Outflow Variations of a Novel LVAD Accessory Compared to Generic LVAD Pump Outflow

Abstract

Introduction: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is a treatment option for end-stage heart failure, requiring a sternotomy. A novel accessory, redirecting the outflow via the left ventricular apex into the ascending aorta, allows for LVAD implantation via left thoracotomy. Pressure distribution within accessory designs is unknown. Our goal was to compare three different outflow designs with a generic LVAD outflow (Control) to optimize the accessory’s outflow design. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that the LVAD accessory leads to higher pressure head loss than Control and that there are relevant differences among varied designs. Methods: Volume models of the LVAD accessory variations (A–C) and Control were created using computer aided design. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) was used to simulate blood flow through the accessories and generic outflows. A verification study was performed to optimize numerical parameters. Pressure head loss (mmHg) was calculated for each outflow while changing the LVAD flow rate continuously (2–7 L/min). Pressure loss was compared by mean differences (MD). Results: Pressure head loss increased with higher LVAD flow rate among all groups. Addressing the accessories’ outflow designs, Design B revealed the lowest increase in pressure loss revealing a mean slope of 2.3 mmHg/L/min compared to 4.6 and 3.0 for Design A and C. Referring to a flow rate of 5.5 L/min, a common flow rate among clinical LVAD patients, and comparing pressure head loss with Control, we found an additional pressure loss of 15.5, 6.4 and 8.3 mmHg in Design A, B and C, respectively. Conclusion: There is a trade off between fitting the outflow design to the cardiac geometry and the pressure head loss. Continued optimization of the LVAD accessory could allow minimally invasive LVAD implantation with minimal changes in LVAD performance. Potential compromise between improved design and performance renders CFD an important tool for medical device development.