Abstract

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy is an effective device therapy for heart failure patients with conduction block. However, a problem with this invasive technique is the nearly 30% of non-responders. A number of studies have reported a functional line of block of cardiac excitation propagation in responders. However, this can only be detected using non-contact endocardial mapping. Further, although the line of block is considered a sign of responders to therapy, the mechanism remains unclear.Methods: Herein, we created two patient-specific heart models with conduction block and simulated the propagation of excitation based on a cellmodel of electrophysiology. In one model with a relatively narrow QRS width (176 ms), we modeled the Purkinje network using a thin endocardial layer with rapid conduction. To reproduce a wider QRS complex (200 ms) in the second model, we eliminated the Purkinje network, and we simulated the endocardial mapping by solving the inverse problem according to the actual mapping system.Results: We successfully observed the line of block using non-contact mapping in the model without the rapid propagation of excitation through the Purkinje network, although the excitation in the wall propagated smoothly. This model of slow conduction also reproduced the characteristic properties of the line of block, including dense isochronal lines and fractionated local electrocardiograms. Further, simulation of ventricular pacing from the lateral wall shifted the location of the line of block. By contrast, in the model with the Purkinje network, propagation of excitation in the endocardial map faithfully followed the actual propagation in the wall, without showing the line of block. Finally, switching the mode of propagation between the two models completely reversed these findings.Conclusions: Our simulation data suggest that the absence of rapid propagation of excitation through the Purkinje network is the major cause of the functional line of block recorded by non-contact endocardial mapping. The line of block can be used to identify responders as these patients loose rapid propagation through the Purkinje network.

Highlights

  • The therapeutic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) for patients with heart failure with conduction block have been confirmed by number of clinical trials, the existence of non-responders remains a major health and economic problem (Kirk and Kass, 2013; Prinzen et al, 2013; Yu and Hayes, 2013)

  • In a detailed analysis of the activation sequence in the left ventricle (LV) using the unipolar non-contact mapping system to assess the activation wave front, Auricchio et al reported that the LV activation sequence in patients with heart failure and left bundle-branch block was blocked by a narrow region of slow conduction, which could not cross directly to the lateral wall from the anterior region (Auricchio et al, 2004)

  • Bipolar contact mapping of the LV endocardium performed in the same patients revealed a continuous propagation of the activation wave front, and were unable to demonstrate a line of block (Auricchio et al, 2004)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The therapeutic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) for patients with heart failure with conduction block have been confirmed by number of clinical trials, the existence of non-responders remains a major health and economic problem (Kirk and Kass, 2013; Prinzen et al, 2013; Yu and Hayes, 2013). Unipolar signals by non-contact mapping were recorded by 64 electrodes mounted equidistantly on a 7.6 mL balloon (size 1.8 × 4.6 cm) placed in the LV cavity. The authors speculated that the line of block reflects the abnormal propagation pattern of intramural activation (Auricchio et al, 2004) This underlying mechanism has not been confirmed clinically. A number of studies have reported a functional line of block of cardiac excitation propagation in responders This can only be detected using non-contact endocardial mapping. The line of block is considered a sign of responders to therapy, the mechanism remains unclear

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.