About the controversies of the cardioprotective effect of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) between animal studies and clinical meta-analyses: a review with several strategies to enhance the beneficial effects of n-3 PUFAs.

Abstract

Several meta-analyses describing the effect of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on the survival rate of the victims of an acute coronary event do not clearly support a beneficial impact of these fatty acids. Yet, animal studies consistently show n-3 PUFA-induced protection against ischemia-reperfusion-induced myocardial injuries. The impact on reperfusion arrhythmias of these PUFAs is more controversial. The literature shows the anti-arrhythmic properties of circulating n-3 PUFAs. However, when these fatty acids are incorporated in the cardiac membrane, they protect the myocardial tissue vis a vis cellular damage but they can be either pro- or anti-arrhythmic during reperfusion, depending on the severity of tissue injuries. The latter elements can explain the lack of beneficial effect observed in the meta-analyses, but a proper use of n-3 PUFAs may provide advantages in terms of survival rate. This review discusses the different results obtained in humans and animals and presents several strategies to enhance the beneficial effects of n-3 PUFAs.