Aberrant Subclavian Arteries and Associated Kommerell Diverticulum: Endovascular vs Open Repair

Abstract

BackgroundVarious surgical options have been described for the treatment of aberrant subclavian arteries and an associated Kommerell diverticulum. MethodsBetween 1999 and 2019, 43 patients underwent a repair, comprising 26 (61%) endovascular and 17 (39%) open approaches. The endovascular approach consisted of initial subclavian revascularization followed by thoracic endovascular aortic repair. The open approach included total arch replacement (12%) and reverse hemiarch repair with left thoracotomy (53%) or right thoracotomy (35%). The perioperative and long-term outcomes were retrospectively reviewed. ResultsNo mortality occurred in the endovascular group, whereas there was 1 (6%) in the open approach group. Patients in the endovascular group demonstrated a shorter hospital stay (3.5 days vs 10.0 days; P = .001) and less frequent prolonged mechanical ventilation (0% vs 24%; P = .019), with a lower occurrence of pneumonia (0% vs 24%; P = .019). Among patients who had the endovascular approach, shrinkage of Kommerell diverticulum or aberrant vessel origin was seen in 96%. Furthermore, relief of dysphagia was confirmed in 92% (12/13), including patients without Kommerell diverticulum (n = 3) after endovascular repair. The cumulative incidence of treatment failure or aortic reintervention at 7 years was 21% and 14 % in the endovascular and open approach groups, respectively (P = .62). Two (8%) patients in the endovascular group required an open reintervention. One reintervention was performed for persistent dysphagia in the setting of an untreated complete vascular ring, and the other was for persistent false lumen flow associated with aortic dissection. ConclusionsThe treatment approach should be individualized on the basis of the aortic disease and comorbidities. The endovascular approach is a viable and effective alternative in the presence of suitable landing zones.