A191 PERSISTENT BENEFIT OF DIETITIAN-LED GLUTEN-FREE DIET EDUCATION AT CD DIAGNOSIS ON DIETARY ADHERENCE IN CHILDREN AND ADULTS WITH TYPE 1 DIABETES AND CELIAC DISEASE

Abstract

BackgroundCeliac disease (CD) is a common autoimmune comorbidity of type 1 diabetes (T1D) with a gluten-free diet (GFD) being the current gold standard treatment for this condition. Adherence to a GFD can be impacted by several factors including dietetic counselling, yet little is known about the impact of clinic-based interventions on long-term GFD adherence in this population.AimsTo prospectively evaluate the impact of a dietitian-led GFD education intervention on adherence to a GFD in children and adults with T1D and CD over a 3-year period.MethodsA cohort of N=62 pediatric and adult subjects who screened seropositive for CD as part of the CD-DIET clinical trial were followed over a 3-year period post-CD diagnosis and assessed on the basis of the GFD education regimen they received at initial CD diagnosis. This included 3 groups: 1) intensive dietitian training (IDT = 5 dietitian visits over 1 year while following GFD), 2) single dietitian training (SDT = 1 GFD training session after 1 year of following GCD) and 3) no dietitian training (NDT) at CD diagnosis. Annual visits included serologic testing of TTG-IgA titres, anthropometric assessments and the completion of questionnaires evaluating diet and adherence to a GFD. Data was analysed longitudinally using linear mixed effects and generalized estimating equations (GEE) regression modeling adjusting for the fixed effects of age, sex, duration of diabetes and time.ResultsAt baseline, participants who received IDT (n=15), SDT (n=16) and NDT (n=31) represented 24.2%, 25.8%, and 50.0% of the cohort, respectively. Over the 3-year study period, participants in the IDT group had the greatest odds of self-reporting being a GFD, with odds 4.3 (95%CI: 1.1 to 16.4; P=0.033) and 9.5 (95%CI: 2.7 to 33.7; P<0.001) greater than the SDT and NDT groups, respectively. The assessment of daily gluten intakes less than 10mg, as recommended for a GFD, revealed a lack of differences between the IDT and SDT groups. In contrast, the NDT group had significantly lower odds of meeting this threshold relative to those who received IDT (OR=0.2; 95%CI: 0.04 to 0.56; P=0.004). No longitudinal differences in TTG-IgA levels were seen between groups over the 3-year period.ConclusionsIn diabetes patients greater contact with a dietitian at CD diagnosis was associated with higher levels of GFD adherence over time, which was not reflected in follow-up Serologic evaluation. These findings highlight the importance of nutritional support in patients with both diabetes and celiac disease at the time of CD diagnosis. In addition, following TTG-IgA alone does not fully inform dietary compliance to a GFD.Diet teaching stratification Diet assignmentFunding AgenciesJuvenile Diabetes Research Foundation / PSI