Abstract

At our institution, we have roughly 300 different CT protocols in routine clinical use. Of these 300 protocols, we have 149 distinct clinical indications that are not broken up into different patient sizes [1]. A single-phase examination with three reconstructions has roughly 50 editable fields on the scanner. These parameters need to be maintained across 12 scanner models, which translates to 180,000 (300 50 12) unique scanner parameters needed to define our complete CT protocol set. This is a low estimate because many of our examinations are multiphasic and have more than three reconstructions. This estimate also does not include any clinical parameters (eg, patient preparation, contrast instructions), which are important to maximize the diagnostic utility and workflow of our CT practice. Almost immediately, problems arise when so many protocols and protocol parameters are in clinical use. Maintaining the same protocol name and number identifier for the same indication on all scanners has proved challenging at our institution, requiring a dedicated effort by our lead CT technologist. Furthermore, many dose monitoring software packages use protocol number identifiers. Therefore, managing the

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.