Abstract

It has been shown numerically in previous works that the well-posedness of the spatial semi-discretization plays a crucial role in obtaining stable numerical schemes for elastodynamic frictionless contact problems. The purpose of this paper is thus to introduce a mass redistribution method adapted to elastodynamic contact with Coulomb friction that guarantees the well-posedness of the semi-discrete problem. It is shown that a differentiated treatment has to be applied to the friction condition. Some numerical tests illustrating the gain in stability for the midpoint time integration scheme are presented. They suggest also that, although the differentiated treatment is necessary for the well-posedness, it is not always mandatory from the numerical viewpoint.

Highlights

  • The aim of this paper is to describe a spatial well-posed semi-discretization for elastodynamic unilateral contact problems with Coulomb friction

  • The purpose of this paper is to introduce a mass redistribution method adapted to elastodynamic contact with Coulomb friction that guarantees the well-posedness of the semi-discrete problem

  • Among the strategies already proposed in the literature, we refer to (1) for a time integration scheme that is adapted to take into account a restitution coefficient coming from an impact law

Read more

Summary

A WELL-POSED SEMI-DISCRETIZATION OF ELASTODYNAMIC CONTACT PROBLEMS WITH

Y. RENARD‡ (Universitede Lyon, CNRS, INSA-Lyon, ICJ UMR5208, F 69621, Villeurbanne, France). RENARD‡ (Universitede Lyon, CNRS, INSA-Lyon, ICJ UMR5208, F 69621, Villeurbanne, France) It has been shown numerically in previous works that the well-posedness of the spatial semi-discretization plays a crucial role in obtaining stable numerical schemes for elastodynamic frictionless contact problems. The purpose of this paper is to introduce a mass redistribution method adapted to elastodynamic contact with Coulomb friction that guarantees the well-posedness of the semi-discrete problem. Some numerical tests illustrating the gain in stability for the midpoint time integration scheme are presented. They suggest that, the differentiated treatment is necessary for the well-posedness, it is not always mandatory from the numerical viewpoint

Introduction
A classical finite-element approximation
The mass redistribution method
Well-posedness result
Energy decreasing result
An elementary example
Numerical tests
Findings
Concluding remarks
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call