Abstract

We consider vibro–impact problems, i.e. mechanical systems with a finite number of degrees of freedom submitted to perfect unilateral constraints. The dynamics is basically described by a second–order measure differential inclusion for the unknown position completed with a constitutive impact law. Another formulation of the problem as a frictionless sweeping process is possible: the unknown velocity belongs to an appropriate functional space and satisfies a first order measure differential inclusion. The equivalence of these two formulations is studied. They lead to time–discretizations written in terms of positions or in terms of velocities, respectively. We present these different schemes and we compare them on the simple test–problem of a bouncing ball. We recall the convergence results in the single constraint case. Moreover, an example of implementation of the scheme derived from the basic description of the dynamics is presented. Finally, in the multi–constraint case, we point out some theoretical and computational difficulties.

Highlights

  • HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not

  • In this article we have presented the time discretizations of vibro-impact problems derived from the basic description of the dynamics and from Moreau’s sweeping process

  • Nothing is said about the convergence order of these methods, which could seem surprising! Two reasons can be recalled

Read more

Summary

Laetitia Paoli

We consider vibro-impact problems, i.e. mechanical systems with a finite number of degrees of freedom submitted to perfect unilateral constraints. The dynamics is basically described by a second-order measure differential inclusion for the unknown position completed with a constitutive impact law. Another formulation of the problem as a frictionless sweeping process is possible: the unknown velocity belongs to an appropriate functional space and satisfies a first order measure differential inclusion. The equivalence of these two formulations is studied.

The set of admissible positions is given by
Let us denote by
Let us define u by
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call